We're nearing the end of the NBA regular season, which means
award ballots will be due pretty soon. And because award ballots
will be due pretty soon, the conversation around who deserves what
award or team selection will ramp up.
We've seen recent pushes for Devin Booker (and to a lesser
extent, Jayson Tatum) to get MVP love; Pascal Siakam is making a
compelling case for an All-NBA forward slot, while his rookie
companion Scottie Barnes is, at worst, making a serious push for
Rookie of the Year. The Defensive Player of the Year award
competition seems very much in the air right now.
These conversations fluctuate between fun, informative,
nauseating and flat-out toxic — please check any and all xenophobia
at the door, for example — but the conversations happen for a
reason. We're watching (and hopefully enjoying!) the best
men-ballers in the world, and want them to be rewarded for their
excellence. It's a status thing, as well as a legacy thing, once
you zoom out to Hall-of-Fame or GOAT talks.
As someone who doesn't have a ballot (email me whenever you're
ready, NBA), I generally love digging into the awards. On the flip
side, my level of care for it leads to frustration. While it would
be unrealistic and unwise for everyone to follow the exact same
rubric, the lack of consensus from the league and/or voters on key
factors can get bothersome.
Heading into the final two weeks of the season, I have a few
questions that I think the voting pool should come to a general
understanding on, even if the selections themselves differ.
HOW AVAILABLE DO PLAYERS NEED TO BE?
Before digging into specific award questions, I don't think
there's a more pressing issue than this one. The combination of
injuries and COVID absences have ravaged the NBA over the past
couple of seasons. It's hard to blame a player for
missing games due to either, but you have to split hairs once award
I think the voting choices could be made a little easier if
there was a baseline expectation in terms of games played or
minutes played. For my personal, fictitious ballot, I filtered for
70% of games played last season. I dropped that threshold to 60%
this year in light of how wild the absences were at the beginning
of the season.
Whatever the marker is — 50 games, 2,000 minutes — having
something objective in place to limit the pool off rip could be
"Voter X" doesn't hate your team and shouldn't get death
threats in their DMs; your favorite player simply missed half the
WHAT TO DO ABOUT NIKOLA JOKIC AND JOEL
The MVP conversation is exhausting enough; they're both worthy
candidates for different reasons. It would not — NOT — be a
"robbery" if Embiid beats out Jokic, or if Jokic beats Embiid. You
can disagree, but they've been two of the top three players in the
league all year long.
The more pressing concern comes with All-NBA voting. As
mentioned, Jokic and Embiid have been two of the top three
players in the league this season. They also play the same
position (center); more importantly, that is
the only position those two have played.
I don't love Basketball-Reference's position estimates because
they seem to be height-based more than role-based, but it's telling
that Embiid and Jokic have played 100% of their minutes at the 5 by
their tally. That number was at 99% for Jokic last season, but
reasonable folks are not giving Jokic the forward/center
designation because he played 37 seconds with Bol Bol.
But yet, here we are, with Jokic and Embiid being eligible at
forward for All-NBA voting.
Small note: I’m told that both Nikola Jokic
and Joel Embiid will be eligible at both forward and center on the
On the surface, it's a welcome loophole to give both players the
First Team selection they deserve. Zoom in even a small percentage,
and you'll see that it's a level of fudging that royally screws a
forward on the third team. The debate then becomes: Has the NBA's
fourth-best center (Rudy Gobert?) been better than the NBA's
sixth-best forward (Siakam? Jimmy Butler?). And... probably not?
But that shouldn't be the discussion to begin with.
I know, you know, we know that Jokic and Embiid are not forwards
in the slightest. If you want to get into the role-played
discussion, why is Jokic more of a forward than a guard? Explain it
to me like I'm 5.
If you have Jokic over Embiid for MVP, you're admitting Embiid
has been the second-best center in the NBA. The inverse is true if
you're voting for Embiid. There are some positional gray areas to
sort through this year (hi DeMar DeRozan and Luka Doncic); there is
no debate about what position Jokic and Embiid play.
The real solution here is for the NBA to
change the ballot, either going completely positionless or using
the All-Star game format (two backcourt, three frontcourt). I've
seen a middle ground mentioned — two backcourt, two frontcourt, one
wild card — and I'd be cool with that.
Until then, my take is to make the tough choice. One of Embiid
or Jokic should be the Second Team center — because they're
This has been heavily debated due to the outlier (at least until
recently) production of Cleveland Cavaliers big man Evan
In years past, Rookie of the Year has mostly been the "who has
the best per-game stats" award. Naturally, guards (or wings) have
the leg up because they have the ball in their hands; Blake Griffin
(2011) and Karl-Anthony Towns (2016) are the only bigs to win the
award in the last 15 years.
Mobley has a good enough case with numbers — roughly 15 points
and 8 rebounds with 2.5 stocks (steals plus blocks) is nothing to
sneeze at — but the foundation of his case has been what he's been
able to do on the non-glamour end.
He hasn't just been rookie-good; he's made a legit All-Defense case for his
work this season. There's been slippage as of late, a natural
byproduct of the team falling apart around him (bye Jarrett Allen),
but his unique skill set unlocks a lot of what the Cavs have done
from a scheme perspective.
While acknowledging that Mobley gets fair usage as an elbow or
handoff hub, it's still fair to dub him as a play-finisher. That's
in contrast to Barnes, who's had to wear a multitude of hats
offensively, and the show-running that Cade Cunningham has assumed
in Detroit (with the worst roster context among the serious ROY
It's become a sort of fundamental debate: Do you value the
on-ball responsibility or the defensive aptitude more?
I don't like that question — too broad for my taste — but I'd
like to get to a point where the defense is factored in, period,
before getting to where it's valued in relation to that.
(As an aside: On March 14, I tweeted that I didn't see a real case for a
non-Mobley guy to win the award to that point. Barnes has
thoroughly shut me up in that time frame; 16-7-5-1-1 while taking
on a multitude of tough defensive assignments is pretty darn
impressive. Toronto's 6-2 record helps too. I'll take my L.)
WHY CAN'T JA MORANT WIN THE MOST IMPROVED PLAYER
This was a question born from a Twitter Space held by the Basketball News staff
on Friday. There seems to be a pretty common sentiment that a
player of Ja Morant's stature — an All-Star, easy All-NBA candidate
and fringe MVP candidate — has been too good to win
Most Improved, especially within the context of his draft
I'm not saying Morant would be my choice; to be transaparent, I
had Miles Bridges as my front-runner when discussing this on The
Dunker Spot (subscribe!), and I want to take
the next week or so to solidify my selections.
But the logic doesn't track for me. If the award is "Most
Improved", the criteria should be "who improved the most." If the
answer if Morant, who has taken substantial statistical leaps and
has improved in virtually every area of his game, why should he be
disqualified off rip?
If the spirit of the award is "who made the most unexpected
leap", then I'd like for that to be agreed upon and carried out
Looking to go to the hottest
concerts, sports, theater & family shows near you? Get 100%
guaranteed tickets to more than 125,000 live events from
TicketSmarter, the official ticket marketplace of
BasketballNews.com. Order online