He can’t be a lead guard.
He’s not a point guard.
He can’t get to the rim.
You’ve probably seen these kinds of phrases thrown around as
long as you’ve watched the NBA, and for good reason. Lead
guard/primary ball-handler play is pretty essential to good
Driving the ball, getting to the rim, collapsing the defense and
forcing a defensive rotation/help at the rim with a well-timed pass
to the vacated spot where the help came from (or an even more
ambitious pass to where help is coming from next) are staples of
modern offense in the league.
Ja Morant, Luka Doncic and Trae Young are three of the idyllic
rim-pressure threats in their own variations.
Morant is the absurd downhill athlete with incredible at-rim
pop. Defenses sell out to stop him from even nearing the paint.
Doncic (No. 2 in the league in drives per game) breaks down his man
with strength, rhythm and angles
Young is a pull-up artist with a type of guile in his movements
that forces overplays on the exterior, and he uses it to his
benefit, gliding to the paint and utilizing one of the best
floaters in the league (also disguised as a lob!) to punish the
defense. Young takes the least shots at the rim of the three, but
getting there is not an issue in the slightest, and he's worked his
game to use his touch and shiftiness to his advantage.
All three are varying levels of passers ranging from very good
to preternatural, but the point remains that their differing gifts,
along with their honed craft, are the perfect catalysts for
What about the guards/ball-handlers who are imperfect though?
I'm not sure I've been more interested in such a thought than I
have been this season.
Darius Garland, a player whom many draft analysts wondered if he
could get to the rim enough, just makes it work. Prolific pull-up
shooting, a phenomenal handle and stellar court vision allow him to
work around his own at-rim struggles. He gets to the rim and to the
paint with regularity, but due to his lack of verticality,
finishing there isn't his forte. Drop-offs, dump-offs and
well-placed and disguised lobs in tandem with his floater (in the
same vein of Young) formulate the ability to set up his fantastic
array of lob partners.
That timing aspect — VERY IMPORTANT.
Part of what makes this work for Garland is how sneaky he is
with his interior game. Everything he does is lightning quick,
often even taking his bigs by surprise (I swear at least one-third
of his turnovers are bobbled passes that shock the recipient).
Quickness, pace and timeliness.
First off, this pass is freakin sick. Second, this is a great
(albeit exaggerated) microcosm of what makes Garland so effective:
the defense is always guessing. He's always pushing and
probing and again, the defense is on its heels as he keeps the
pressure on making it look like he could score. If
stifled, he's superb at moving the ball, moving himself with
quickness and then making himself available for the ball again as
soon as possible. He's like a hornet, constantly stinging with an
absurd work rate that's so difficult to keep pace with as a
Immanuel Quickley enters stage left
The aforementioned three questions have been asked over and over
again this year in regard to Immanuel Quickley and his ability to
lead an offense. They're the same questions that were asked when he
By definition, Quickley IS a combo guard. He is not Garland, as
he lacks the same handle and playmaking ability that made the Cavs'
maestro a first time All-Star, but through that same lens, there
are some comparisons that can be drawn.
Since the All-Star Break (20 games, Knicks 10-10), Quickley is
averaging 15.2 points and 4.2 assists with 1.2 turnovers per game
on 61.1% True Shooting in slightly over 26 minutes of play per
night. He's bombed away from three, taking 5.1 treys per game
hitting at a 39.2% clip; most importantly, it's how he's getting
these shots off.
Three-and-a-half of these long-distance tries per game are
pull-up threes (shooting 41.4%), forcing defenses to prioritize his
jumper and consistently forcing his defender to go over on
ball-screens he runs.
One of my favorite and the most encouraging things: He is
becoming quite cunning at grifting for fouls (a gift), averaging 4.8 trips to
the line per game after the break. He's eighth in percentage of
points derived from free throws in that time frame, actually ahead
of RJ Barrett, who has been putting work in at the line.
He's so good at snaking, using his body to wall off his man and
baiting him into contact. He has a real knack for selling fouls
while also deserving them if that makes sense, even if it is
grifty! This is an awesome development and legitimate way to buoy
his offensive game.
Quickley is shooting 45.0% from 4 to 14 feet over that span (30%
of his total shots), a large portion of his offense. The floater is essential for him.
Much like we've seen with Bruce Brown in his ebbs and flows, the
floater diet is a tough one; if it's not falling, the defense will
adjust accordingly. But, if it is at a high clip, it puts the
defense in a quandary. It is just a really hard shot to NOT contest
even if it typically has less inherent value than a layup in
Quickley is a good passer, not a great one — an important
distinction. Ideally, he's not your best playmaker on the floor. I
would honestly love to see him be more aggressive in some of the
reads he makes. He'll make really good quick decisions, but he can
be rather safe with the ball at times. He doesn't have the typical
downhill burst of a primary ball-handler who will fully break a
defense, but the quickness and timing of the passes he does make —
due to the gravity he commands as a pull-up threat out of
pick-and-roll — can allow him to imitate some of those looks.
Since the All-Star Break, Quickley is averaging 8.3 potential
assists, accounting for all passes that lead to a shot attempt
regardless of a make or miss. That puts him in the same ballpark of
Jimmy Butler (8.2), DeMar DeRozan (8.6) and Julius Randle (8.5),
all players with a significant usage and substantially higher
minutes played than Quickley. That's not to say that he's a better
scorer or playmaker, but rather to illustrate that he's doing more
than the assists might indicate at face value.
This possession is such a great encapsulation of what Quickly
RJ Hampton sells out for the Quickley stepback three. Quickley
makes a really quick outlet pass to Obi Toppin in the slot and
moves himself immediately.
A quick pause: YES. This is so huge; the relocation and constant
movement. A great way to offset the lack of other primary skills is
to push the tempo — always moving, always scanning and always
relocating after you're out of an action. If you immediately make
yourself available after the ball leaves your hands, you can put
some added strain on a defense. Simple, but very effective. (This
is something Tyrese Haliburton is great at.)
Yes, the initial dent Quickley puts in the defense might be
lesser than that of a true primary, but with a good offensive ethos
and the principles laid out, we've seen the ability for some really
solid offenses to live on continuous advantage creation and
Quickley gets far enough in to draw Devin Cannady over in a help
scenario before kicking to Barrett for the corner three. I don't
have a "for sure" answer, but it feels like if Quickley is able to
get another step into the paint with even more of an at-rim/floater
sell, perhaps he puts even more of a dent in the defense. I'm
nitpicking, but it's also important to note that this is just a
harder way of life as an offensive player. If Cannady is actually a
wing-sized player guarding Barrett, it's a shot that's much easier
With Robinson in the dunker spot, Robin Lopez is rather frozen,
and on the IQ fake, he immediately seeks out Robinson's body to
prevent the lob or box him out on a shot attempt.
There are subtleties in pacing Quickly can improve upon (he's
already shown great signs of growth) that could make him even more
impactful. Pairing him with lob partners like Robinson and Jericho
Sims makes his floater and the threat of it that much more
impactful, as he starts to work on masking his shot and pass to
mimic one another. Sims' screening has been very fun to see work in
tandem with Quickley as well; he's easily the best screener on the
team that isn't IQ.
Per Cleaning the Glass, the Knicks' offense scores 5.3 points
per 100 possessions more with Quickley on the floor. Yes, on/offs
are extremely finicky and New York's awful starting unit plays a
huge part in this sizable differential. Yet, that's also part of
the point, no?
When IQ is on the floor, the Knicks actively seek more
opportunities in transition and push more off of live rebounds.
Truly, they just move quicker and with more purpose, something
that's been a real issue for this Knicks team. The young guys play
with pace, actively relocate, make quick decisions and continue to
Barrett is the power wing that was promised, currently in the
midst of his own breakout with high usage. In some ways, tasking IQ
and Barrett with overlapping usage and quasi-primary creation
together could be (and has been) a boon. RJ is one of the best in
the league at getting to the rim (the finishing deserves its own
article), and the pair together can mask some of its offensive
flaws/inefficiencies. Both can start sets, both can capitalize upon
advantages, and both are still feeling out their own abilities as
Per Cleaning the Glass, lineups with Quickley and Barrett that
don't feature Randle are outscoring opponents by 4.8 points per 100
possessions (747 possessions total, a solid sample). This is not
intended as a refrendum on Randle; it's just a case in point when
looking at who is commanding usage on the court.
Quickley doesn't get to the rim with regularity, but he does
things that can emulate lead guard play. It's a harder diet to
survive on, but so is *checks notes* everything else the Knicks
have tried this season. He's shown enough encouraging signs that he
It's been time for the Knicks' front office/Tom
Thibodeau/whoever the heck is in charge there to prioritize
Quickley and his ability to elevate the offense — and with hope,
that's what they'll do this offseason.