Dan Grunfeld is a former professional basketball player who
spent eight seasons playing in various countries around the world,
such as Germany, Spain, and Israel. He had a decorated career at
Stanford University, and spent his life playing in different
leagues internationally. He is the son of former New York Knicks
guard and former Washington Wizards president Ernie Grunfeld. Dan
shares his overseas experiences in the article below, detailing how
the European game can positively affect the NBA.
After a crucial victory in the last home game of my second
pro-basketball season, a teammate jumped on my back and poured
champagne on my head. Our fans rushed the court, as a marching band
serenaded us. I was playing in Spain at the time, living by the
beach and lunching on paella, just a young American trying to
figure out basketball in Europe.
Our whole team went out together that night to celebrate our
triumph. We laughed and hugged and snapped pictures to commemorate
the occasion. One of my Spanish teammates chugged a beer through
his T-shirt, a maneuver I’d never seen before, but quite
appreciated. None of us seemed to care that, out of the 18 teams in
our league, we’d just positioned ourselves to finish in 14th
place.
The concept of relegation is not new in Europe – teams that end
the year at the bottom of the standings are relegated to a lower
league the following year – but it ensures competitive play
throughout the season. While my team in Spain had long been
eliminated from playoff contention, our intensity only increased as
we tried to avoid relegation. The overall level of play in our
league never diminished, either, since nearly every team was
fighting for something late in the year. During our end-of-season
revelry, I remember thinking how different this was from the NBA,
whose final stretch was often marked by a lack of engagement and
blatant tanking by teams with nothing left to play for but a draft
pick.
This year, however, thanks to flattened lottery odds that
disincentivize losing and a new play-in tournament that keeps more
teams in the postseason picture, the NBA is experiencing a
late-season competitive renaissance. As the incomparable Howard
Beck pointed out in his recent Sports Illustrated
article detailing this phenomenon, “Twenty-four teams are still
competing, with about a dozen games left on the schedule. That
isn’t just dramatic by recent NBA standards. It’s downright
revolutionary.”
In the spirit of European leagues, the NBA has created systems
and controls that have elevated the league's late-season product.
As someone who played abroad in Europe, this got me thinking about
other elements of the European game that have similar potential to
improve (even just incrementally) some aspect of basketball here in
the States.
I was immediately reminded of one small difference I observed in
Europe that’s likely unknown to the majority of basketball fans.
It’s a minor systemic wrinkle, yet one that I believe has lasting
positive ripple effects across Europe’s basketball culture. And who
knows? It might just inspire America’s next subtle basketball
innovation from across the pond.
The distinct feature of European basketball I’m referring to is,
believe it or not, the composition of the stat sheet. Let me
explain! As a developing player in the States, I prioritized points
over everything else. It had always been the final number displayed
on my stat line, the one my eyes instinctively landed on after a
game, the one my friends and I talked about to assess our
performance. Points became our de facto North Star, the way we
calculated our value or the quality of our play.
In Spain, by contrast, the last and most important number on any
given box score isn’t points; it’s something called “valoración”
(which translates to "assessment"). Valoración is a simple rating
of a player’s overall impact on the game, taking into account not
only points, but also rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, shooting
percentages, turnovers and fouls given and received. Box scores for
the EuroLeague, the best international league in the world, are
anchored by a similar rating. The calculation is unsophisticated
and doesn’t weigh the individual statistical components – a point
and a block and a received foul are all worth the same, even though
they might not have the same impact on the game – but it still
effectively rewards and encourages well-rounded basketball. The
Spanish leagues publicly distributes a weekly MVP award to the
player with the highest valoración for that round of play.
While I was most focused on points when I got to Europe, my
European teammates were most focused on valoración. Their measure
of success was more nuanced than my own. Production for them was
rooted in playing versatile and efficient basketball, whereas I
overvalued my scoring total. This emphasis on a player’s entire
output, a mindset that is cultivated starting at the youth level,
helps contribute to the team-oriented style that has come to
represent the European game. European players are known for taking
good shots, moving the ball, and valuing each possession – actions
that are rewarded in their rating. For an example of the European
basketball ethos, look no further than the San Antonio Spurs, a
team that wowed audiences and won championships with a selfless,
egalitarian, pass-first approach that was often described, with
great admiration, as “international.”
To be clear, I’m not suggesting that American players like me
are selfish or unconcerned with winning, because that’s absolutely
false. The truth is that our basketball culture is merely a bit
more individualistic than the European version, and our respective
box-score constructions reflect that. America produces the world’s
best players because of that individualism, not despite it, but
there’s still little downside in clearly prioritizing total
production over points, particularly with young players.
I’m also not suggesting that the NBA should just add a player
rating to each stat sheet in order to highlight activity in a
different way. It’s not that simple, and similar measurements such
as PER and PIE are already used at the NBA level, even if they’re
not included on each box score. Additionally, the NBA box score has
featured +/-, the net change in score when a player is on the
court, since 2007. The +/- computation is heavily influenced by a
team’s success and is not as representative of true individual
yield as a performance rating, but it is certainly a step in that
direction.
The takeaway for me is that, given how ingrained these outlooks
become in basketball communities, there’d likely be value in
helping developing American players to think about their effect on
the game in broader terms than scoring. The NBA might consider
exerting its sizable influence on the American basketball system to
tinker with how production is summarized at the youth level, in
high school and perhaps even in college. The G League could also be
fertile ground to experiment with a new statistical format such as
this one. For those ball players in America who’ll one day be
wearing NBA uniforms, it couldn’t hurt to grow accustomed to
standing out on a stat sheet by impacting the game in a variety of
ways.
It’s been many, many years since our team in Spain saved
ourselves from relegation, but it’s a memory that will endure. We
were on top of the world that night, even though we were near the
bottom of the standings. That shows how much we cared about winning
at the end of the season. The NBA’s play-in tournament, in
combination with the modified draft lottery odds, has currently
produced a similar effect in the world’s top league. It’s made me
realize how healthy of an exercise it is, at the very least, to
look to Europe for other opportunities to advance the American
game.
The European stat line taught me to evaluate my performance in a
more expansive way, which helped make me a better pro. It’s an
education I’m sharing now in hopes that it might benefit others
earlier than it benefitted me. A slight adjustment to the current
American box score is far from a panacea. At scale, though, it’s
the type of innovation that might have a positive impact on how
eventual NBA players define success and, in turn, play the
game.