I feel bad for the Phoenix Mercury.
They're fresh off a season-ending blowout loss to the Las Vegas
Aces. The 37-point beatdown included multiple playoff records being
broken by the Aces — most consecutive made field goals to start a
game (10), most threes made in an opening quarter (8) and the most
made threes in a game (23) for starters.
Beyond that, it was an uncerimonious end to a
so-difficult-it's-hard-to-fathom year for the Mercury. The
detainment of Brittney Griner cast a dark cloud over the
organization, and rightfully so. Everyone wants Griner home as soon
as possible. To follow that case while trying to play basketball
was a difficult duality to work through.
On top of that, there was the implementation of a new head coach
in Vanessa Nygaard, some turmoil between said coach and her best
player, Diana Taurasi's up-and-down season (and as she found her
stride, she suffered a season-ending quad injury because, of
course), Tina Charles' departure and a boatload of injuries (and
absences) suffered throughout the roster... I don't know how they
made it through. The Mercury should be commended for their strength
It would've been nice to see them get a home send-off at the
very least. But because of the current playoff format, that simply
The WNBA just shifted to a best-of-three first round after
having single-elimination games to kick off the postseason in years
prior. Going to a series-based first round was a step in the right
direction; selfishly, I'd love to see more done. For example, give
us best of three in the first round, best of five in the second
round and best-of-seven in the Finals. There are scheduling woes
that people smarter than me have much more of a handle on, but a
man can dream.
I will say, though: If a best of three is what we have to work
with in the first round, the home/road split should be handled
As of now, the higher seed gets to defend homecourt for the
first two games. The win-or-go-home Game 3 is played on the lower
I understand why that setup exists; it's a way to reward the
higher seeds for their regular-season play, and incentivizes the
league overall to push for the best record possible. There's a
"take care of your business" element to giving the higher seed the
first two games. If they lose one of the first two games, as the
thinking goes, they have nobody to blame but themselves for having
to close things out on the road.
While that line of thinking is fair, I'm not sure how much
business sense it makes. It's hard to ignore that part, since The W
is still very much in growth mode.
Within that lens, I'm not sure why the league has agreed to a
format that includes the possibility of a team not getting a home
game — which means not getting the revenue that comes along with
hosting a home playoff game.
The NBA comparison isn't 1-to-1 for a multitude of reasons, but
being able to host home playoff games (and the money that comes
with that) is part of the calculus for lower-seeded teams making
playoff pushes instead of taking the step back and playing for
better lottery odds.
Frankly, I'd be asking some semblance of "What was this season
for?" if I'm (a fan of) the Mercury. This season was filled with
hardships. The three best players on the roster weren't available.
You drew the best team in the league, and you didn't even get to
bring things home. There was no young, blue-chip prospect getting
valuable playoff reps (which could've been the case for, say, the
Atlanta Dream if they held on). What was
The Mercury example won't happen every year — dear God, we hope
not — but it's a loud example of the flaws of this current system.
Ideally, the best of three would follow a 1-1-1 game format, with
the higher seed getting to host Game 1 and Game 3. I'd wager that
isn't the case right now due to the lack of charter flights across
(That really needs to be settled by the way.
There's no reason we should be having flight threads and flight
rants from WNBA players in 2022. There are owners willing to pay
for the flights. If cheap/broke owners don't want to oblige,
they're in the wrong darn business.)
While flights remain an issue, the obvious compromise is to flip
the current format. Give the lower seed the first game, then the
higher seed gets Game 2 and Game 3 to close things out. It's
counterintuitive on the surface, but it's a way to guarantee a home
game (and revenue) for both sides without giving away a competitive
advantage for the higher seed.
Think about how pressure-packed a Game 1 would be for the
lower-seeded team. This is the chance for them to
land a punch en route to a potential upset. The stakes would be
high, which should also set the stage
for incredible playoff atmospheres.
The Mercury have long had one of the best (playoff) crowds in
the league; Could you imagine what Game 1 of this series would've
been like once you factor in how much this team has gone through
this year? It would've been one for the books, regardless of how
the actual game would've gone.
We shouldn't rob teams (and their fans) of that opportunity.
Again, a 1-1-1 setup is the most ideal. If The W and their owners
can come to some sort of agreement around charter flights, that
should be the move.
Absent of that happening, though, a 1-2 setup makes more sense
than the 2-1 setup we currently have.